Answer:
From the information given about the contract and its execution between the two parties involved( That is, Parc and Glaze), the option 2 is most likely.
2. Glaze will win because Glaze substantially performed and Parc prevented complete performance.
Explanation:
It is stated that Glaze was hired to remodel and furnish an office suite, after a submitted plans by Glaze were approved by Parc. It was further stated that the construction and painting had been done.
Although, with Glaze purchasing minor accessories which Parc rejected because they did not conform to the plans is a breach of contract, but that can be corrected by calling Glaze to order. However, it was Parc that refused to allow Glaze to make necessary corretion and complete the project and also refused to pay Glaze any part of the contract price.
According to the enotes, if a company does not have a current supplier for a part, they must issue a Request for quotation (RFQ) so their potential supplier can provide a detailed quote that might include more than just a per unit price, it may also include delivery date, and payment terms. This quote invites suppliers into a bidding process to bid on specific products or services. However, it is only the first step in a negotiation with a supplier.
Savings are for saving not spending
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Because that would not make any sense of "distributive marketing
<span>designer/signature
bridge
contemporary
better
moderate
budget</span>
