Answer:
<em>C. defensive strategy </em>
Explanation:
<em><u>Defensive strategy</u></em><em> </em><em> is been represented by the effort of Sal's reduction</em>.
Basically in defensive strategy, the consumers and the customers are been hold-back by the companies and organisations. In this when competition increases the companies try to pull back their old customers from their competitors company.
In the scenario which is been represented in the question the Sal's company indulge's in the action that is known as defensive strategy.
So lets say we have two investment opportunities. A new convenient store in your neighborhood or a new shopping center more than 5 miles away from where you live... What would you invest in well lets look at the pros and cons of each investment. So even though the new convenient store is right around the corner from you and prices are low the new shopping center has better products, warranty and higher prices unlike the convenient store closer to you. So we have an investment budget of $1000 dollars and want to spend it wisely we need to access what has a better chance of being successful with what you put into it. So the convenient store will reach less people has a bargain price but also doesn't have security cameras. Even though the shopping center has great employees, top-of-the-line products, high security, and a great establishment but also has flaws. What are you gonna invest in, will you take risks? My personal opinion is that I would invest in the shopping center because more people would be attracted to it because of the quality of service and products. So it would have a better probability in success and good use of my money.
Answer:
$739.72 ≈ 739.72
Explanation:
we can use an excel spreadsheet and the present value function to calculate the expected price of each bond ⇒ =PV(rate,nper,pmt,fv,[type])
- fv = $1,000
- pmt = $1,000 x 7.25% x 1/2 = $36.25
- nper = 60
- rate = 10% / 2 = 5%
- present value = ?
=PV(5%,60,36.25,1000) = -739.72 since excel calculates the initial investment, it is always negative, so we just change the sign.
Answer:
a. $112,000
b. $7,500
Explanation:
(a) transferred out
Units transferred out are 100% complete for both materials and conversion costs, thus multiply the Total Cost per Equivalent units with the number of units transferred.
Cost of units transferred out = $8 × 14,000 units
= $112,000
(b) in ending work in process
Units of ending work in process are 100% complete in terms of materials ( since materials are entered at the beginning of the process) whilst 25% complete in terms on conversion cost (applied uniformly during production).
Cost of ending work in process
Materials ($3 × 2,000 units) = $6,000
Conversion ($3 × (2,000 units × 25%)) = $1,500
Total Cost = $7,500
