All categories

4 years ago

When the price of audio books, a normal good, falls, causing your purchasing power to rise, you buy more of them due to

Business

1 answer:

grandymaker [24]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The answer is C. Income Effect

Explanation:

Economists refer to income effect as an increase in purchasing power.

It is the change in quantity demanded for a commodity when income changes

For example, consumers tend to buy more of goods and services when their income rises or tend to buy more of a good and service when the price of a goods falls while the income remains constant. This causes the purchasing power (which is the amount of goods that can be purchased with a unit of currency) to rise.

Option A is wrong because substitution effect states that when the price of a good rises, consumer tends to purchase less. This centers on price while income effect centers on income

You might be interested in

Two firms compete in a market to sell a homogeneous product with inverse demand function P = 600 – 3Q. Each firm produces at a c

podryga [215]

Answer:

Explanation:

We need to find the function of firm 1 and firm 2 which we have as

PQ1/Q1= 300

600Q1– 3Q21 – 3Q1Q2/ = 300

300 – 6Q1 – 3Q2= 300

Q1 = 1/6(600 -300 – 3Q2)

Q1 = 50 – 1/2Q2 Reaction function for firm 1

Q2 = 50 – 1/2Q1 Reaction function for firm 2

Cournot which we have as;

Q2 = = 1/6(600 -300 – 3Q1)

Q2 = 50 – 1/2Q1

Q2 = 50 – ½(50 – 1/2Q1)

Q2 = 50 – 25 + 1/4Q1

Q1 = 100/3 = 33.33 Output

Q2= 100/3 = 33.33 Output

Equilibrium market price which is

P = 600 – 3(Q2+ Q2)600 – 3(100/3 + 100/3)= 400

Profits for firm 1

Π1 = TR1– C1= PQ1 – C1=400 * 100/3 – 300 * 100/3= 10000/3 = $3,333.33 For firm 1

Profits for firm 2

Π2 = TR2– C2= PQ2 – C2=400 * 100/3 – 300 * 100/3= 10000/3 = $3,333.33 For firm 2

Stackelberg is given as ;

QL= (600 – 300)/2*3 = 50 Firm 1 output is QL = 50

QF= (600 – 300)/4*3 = 25 Firm 2 output is QF =25 P = 600 – 3*75 = 375

Π1 = (375-300) * 50 = 3750Profit for firm 1

Π2 = 75*25 = 1875 Profit for firm 2

Bertrand is given as ;

Under this competition, price is the same to marginal cost and profits are zero

600 – 3Q = 300

Q = 100 Output = 100

P = Zero

Collusive Behavior is given as;

MR=MC600 - 6Q = 300

300 = 6QQ = 50 Output

P = 600 – 3*50 = 450

Π = (450 – 300) * 50 = 7,500profit

3 0

3 years ago

Oakley Company does not ring up sales taxes separately on the cash register. Total receipts for February amounted to $32,100. If

Murrr4er [49]

Answer: $2100

Explanation:

From the question, we are informed that Oakley Company does not ring up sales taxes separately on the cash register and that the total receipts for February amounted to $32,100 and the sales tax rate is 7%.

The amount that must be remitted to the state for February's sales taxes will be:

= $32,100/(1+7%) × 7%

= $32100/(1 + 0.07) × 0.07

= $32100/1.07 × 0.07

= $2100

7 0

3 years ago

Greer went to her favorite manicure shop but the quality of her manicure was not as well done as previous times. What characteri

JulijaS [17]

Greer decision is linked with the inconsistency of the quality of services.

<u>Explanation: </u>

The consistency with which the service attributes anticipated for customers are delivered is a reliable measurement of total quality in the service industry. Consistency defines how sometimes you demonstrate and offer your clients the desired service quality.

Consistency of service is always expected by all customers; they want calm and no disagreeable surprises. In manufacturing, performance improvement is accomplished via a technique called statistical control of processes or SPC to minimize system uncertainty or variability.

For example, you can't create a consistent quality of service if you're prompt, correct and polite to certain of your customers, sometimes in all your branches. Therefore to say, good service turns into an error. Credibility will not be lasting or successful.

6 0

4 years ago

Ways which business can help in controlling pollution

Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

Pollution permits are a market-based scheme aimed at reducing pollution and trying to encourage firms to reduce the quantity of pollution they create.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Astor Manufacturing stores hazardous and volatile chemicals in its warehouse. The warehouse has state-of-the-art equipment to ma

Wittaler [7]

Answer:

C. strictly liable for Will's injuries

Explanation:

In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.

There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:

1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.

2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.

The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.

But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.

6 0

4 years ago