1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
devlian [24]
3 years ago
9

Congress was designed to be

History
2 answers:
Feliz [49]3 years ago
5 0
Congress was designed to be the legislative branch of government. This body is independent from the executive or judicial branches and is in charge of writing laws.
Natasha2012 [34]3 years ago
3 0

The U.S Congress was designed to be the legislative branch of the federal government. It has independent powers which are defined by the U.S Constitution and it's main responsability is to make the country's laws.

Moreover, it is separated from the executive and judicial branches of the government and it has two houses: the Senate (which is represented by only two senators) and the House of Representatives (which has representatives of their states/districts). Those representatives vote on behalf of all the citizens and the country's best interests.

You might be interested in
Explain how the neolithic age set the stage for the emergence of civilizations
tigry1 [53]

The Neolithic Era or the Stone Age contributed greatly in the creation of civilizations for this was the period where development in terms of agricultural practice, encouragement of developing societies and cities took place. This was the time when men started to domesticate plants and animals. This was somehow the transition from the lifestyle of hunting and gathering to one of agriculture and settlement which made way to the possibility of an increasing larger population during that time. By doing so, they were able to produce more food which led to the mastery of being artisans, merchants, government officials and other professions needed to have civilization. It is said that for a civilization to be considered legit, it must have cities, government, religion, social structure, writing and art. And all these were evident and started during this Period. 

7 0
3 years ago
On the War Front, soldiers needed to use water in order to cool down the machine
Rama09 [41]

Answer:

D)urine

Hopes this helps

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Someone please just help -
Sonbull [250]

Answer:

I think it is A im not sure and im sorry if im wrong but i belive its A

8 0
2 years ago
Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0
1 year ago
Three Chinese Philosophers
vichka [17]

Answer:

Confucianism, Daoism, and Legalism.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Question 1
    5·1 answer
  • Considering what the Founding Fathers were attempting to achieve -- independence from the British government -- what did the sig
    5·1 answer
  • President truman tried to keep communism within its existing boundaries using a policy of _____.
    7·2 answers
  • The Puritans left England because they wanted to simplify religion.<br> t or f
    7·2 answers
  • 1.2.3 discuss The purposes of government ​
    9·1 answer
  • True or false president Lincoln urged the south to reconsider its actions before seceding?
    8·2 answers
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission, formed in 1934 during the First New Deal, still operates today by?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the first reason why the American dream could be achieved, write it in your own words
    6·1 answer
  • How did President Johnson describe some of the challenges his students faced?
    13·1 answer
  • to weaken a federalist attempt to pack the federal courts through late-term appointments authorized by the judiciary act of 1801
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!