B, an argumentative research paper, needs to have an argument. Which kind of needs the author to have a position.
<u>It helps the writers visualize the inside of a black hole. </u>
<em>The other options can described bluntly and scientifically with just names and numbers. </em>
If the writer were to use more formal writing to describe things so abstract like a black hole, it would be hard for the common reader to understand.
____________________________
for example,
The black hole looks like a giant vacuum of nothingness (informal)
The black hole is like a mass whose Schwarzchild radius is outside of itself (formal)
Which is easier to understand? Most likely the first one because of the use of informal language and writing.
Hope I helped!
Answer:Most of the sentences tel the author's POV. The POV is second person. Second person POV is when someone writes from your point of view.
I would use, "You may think you can just watch other people ski and do what they do, but taking lessons will teach you how to ski correctly." as the sentence that reveals the author's POV.
Explanation:
Working in a fast production line requires not only physical strength and quick reflexes but presence of mind. In instances when the operating machine jams, you need to decide quickly to either temporarily pause the production and call an expert to fix the machine to avoid further delays or fix the machine by yourself. The first option is the more sensible one.