Answer:
D. Judicial Activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
It is the opposite of Judicial Restraint, as a judicial philosophy theory, which limits the power of judges to act only as per existing legal provisions under constitution.
What’s the question, I don’t understand that, sorry.
Answer:
<h2>Jiri जिरी</h2><h2>Nickname(s): Switzerland of Nepal</h2>
Explanation:
<h2>___________________________________(✿ ♡‿♡)</h2><h2>
<em><u>PLEASE</u></em><em><u> MARK</u></em><em><u> ME</u></em><em><u> BRAINLIEST</u></em><em><u> AND</u></em><em><u> FOLLOW</u></em><em><u> M</u></em><em><u> E</u></em><em><u> AND</u></em><em><u> SOUL</u></em><em><u> DARLING</u></em><em><u> TEJASWINI</u></em><em><u> SINHA</u></em><em><u> HERE</u></em><em><u> ❤️</u></em></h2>
i think speculation
nice job are u going to law school????
