1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sophie [7]
3 years ago
8

In Federalist Paper no. 51, Madison argues the Constitution would protect the rights of the minority, is he justified in believi

ng that “a coalition of a majority of the whole society could seldom take place on any other principles than those of justice and the general good?”
History
1 answer:
pishuonlain [190]3 years ago
8 0

Madison believed that the existence of various minority groups or political groups would ensure that the oppression of the minority opinion by the coalition of majority must not happen.

The oppressive attitude of the majority over the minor political factions can be restrained when there exists the ‘Community Will’. Prevailing of different small groups in the society would prevent the tyranny of any majority group. Coalition of majority can happen when there is a need of justice for the general good to prevail in the republic.

The power of people must be so strong that even if the people mingle with other small sections they must impede the interest of all other groups being enforced on them.

 

You might be interested in
Both the French and British were interested in controlling Egypt in the 19th century because Egypt had:
Ilya [14]

Answer:

The answer is b. A strategic location for trade

6 0
2 years ago
What civilizations influenced could be found in both the maya and aztec civilizations
Neko [114]
The civilization of Olmec.
3 0
3 years ago
What were two factors that the Japanese failed to damage in their attack on Pearl Harbor
anzhelika [568]

Answer:

They failed to damage the ship and the sailors.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Guyz wart is 1+1? i'm haveing troubal with my hiztorie homwok
Alla [95]

The question is Fish

8 0
3 years ago
The Declaration of Independence states that people have certain unalienable rights. Do the rule still applies today?
vichka [17]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

It does but I cant say people still treat everyone like everyone else their stereotypes and racisms still gets in the way but if you rule it to logical it would be yes

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the Russian Civil War, who favored the White Army?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the United States take military action against the Taliban?
    12·1 answer
  • Which was a problem facing immigrants during the late 1800s?
    10·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast civil liberties with civil rights?
    6·1 answer
  • What are some causes of the first world war
    12·2 answers
  • How did Hoover's and Roosevelt's approaches to handling the Great Depression differ? A. They both held the same views. B. FDR be
    15·2 answers
  • Which newspaper headline would have appeared
    14·1 answer
  • Do the united states and europe have similar "primary interets."
    9·1 answer
  • Summarize the role of religion in the founding of various English colonies. Which of the first thirteen colonies were founded mo
    13·1 answer
  • What did Americans experience during the oil shock of 1979?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!