3 strips of 2.5 feet can be cut from the 7.5 feet long roll of ribbon.
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>DATA:</u>
Length of strips Eli need is 2.5 feet long
Length of roll of ribbon is 7.5 feet long
Number of strips that can be cut from the 7.5 feet long roll is x
<u>SOLUTION:</u>
To determine how many strips can be cut, divide total length of roll of ribbon by the length of strips needed.
Number of strips that can be cut = 
x =
(expression)
x = 3 strips
Therefore, 3 strips of 2.5 feet can be cut from the 7.5 feet long roll of ribbon.
Key words: fraction
Learn more about fractions at
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
Mortality rate is 0.5 per 1000 habitant
the number of deaths have increased (from 210 to 250)
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello
Mortality rate is the number of deaths in a specific population,usually expressed in units of deaths per 1,000 individuals per year

where
S=Mortality rate
D=deaths
P= population
n= is a conversion form ,such as multiplying by 10^{3}=1000, to get mortality rate per 1,000 individuals( we will use n=3)
step 1
asign
S=unknown
D=250
P=500000
n=3, (for each 1000 people)
step 2
Replace

Mortality rate is 0.5 per 1000 habitant
step 3
what if S=0.42
S=0.42(assuming it is 0.42 per 1000,n=3)
D=unknown
P=500000

the number of deaths have increased (from 210 to 250)
Have a great day
Answer:
case 2 with two workers is the optimal decision.
Step-by-step explanation:
Case 1—One worker:A= 3/hour Poisson, ¡x =5/hour exponential The average number of machines in the system isL = - 3. = 4 = lJr machines' ix-A 5 - 3 2 2Downtime cost is $25 X 1.5 = $37.50 per hour; repair cost is $4.00 per hour; and total cost per hour for 1worker is $37.50 + $4.00
= $41.50.Downtime (1.5 X $25) = $37.50 Labor (1 worker X $4) = 4.00
$41.50
Case 2—Two workers: K = 3, pl= 7L= r= = 0.75 machine1 p. -A 7 - 3Downtime (0.75 X $25) = S J 8.75Labor (2 workers X S4.00) = 8.00S26.75Case III—Three workers:A= 3, p= 8L= ——r = 5- ^= § = 0.60 machinepi -A 8 - 3 5Downtime (0.60 X $25) = $15.00 Labor (3 workers X $4) = 12.00 $27.00
Comparing the costs for one, two, three workers, we see that case 2 with two workers is the optimal decision.