Answer:B
Explanation: The WEXS Channel 10 wanted to see how well the candidates would perform with a story that was given to them.
Answer:
Part 1
$1,422,940
Part 2
$331,480
Explanation:
cost of the land calculation
Purchase Price $1305000
Cost to tear down building $121000
Sale of Salvages ($8400)
Leagl fees $5340
Total $1,422,940
The cost of the land that should be recorded by Wilson Co. is: $1,422,940
cost of the building calculation
Architect's fees $47000
Insurance $3900
Liability insurance $4200
Excavation cost $15480
city for pavement $9900
Borrowing Costs $251000
Total $331,480
The cost of the building should be recorded by Wilson Co. is $331,480
Answer:
<em>Cost per equivalent unit for conversion cost = $116.66</em>
<em> </em>
Explanation:
<em>Under the weighted average method of valuation, to account for completed units, it is assumed that the entire degree of work required to a complete a set of work is done in the period under consideration.So there is no separation of the completed units into opening inventory and fully worked.
</em>
To determine the cost per equivalent unit, we use the formula below:
<em>Cost per equivalent unit = $70,000/600</em>
<em> = $116.66</em>
<em />
Answer:
C) Atlanta Company
Explanation:
Let's bear in mind that equity is an advantage that allows your company to buy and sell more.
So more equity means more ability to buy and sell and less the possibility of going bankrupt.
Liability on the other hand also gives advantage in trade r company , so more liability shows strongness of the company.
Now let's compare the equity and liability of the both companies
Atlanta Company
Total liabilities $ 429,000
Total equity 572,000
Spokane Company
Total liabilities $ 549,000
Total equity 1,830,000
The equity ratio is about 1:3
While liability is about 1:1.2
So Atlanta company has more riskier structure
Answer:
- <em>As explained below, given that the score of the person is among the 0.03125 fraction of the best applicants, </em><u><em>he can count on getting one of the jobs.</em></u>
<em></em>
Explanation:
The hint is to use <em>Chebyshev’s Theorem.</em>
Chebyshev’s Theorem applies to any data set, even if it is not bell-shaped.
Chebyshev’s Theorem states that at least 1−1/k² of the data lie within k standard deviations of the mean.
For this sample you have:
- mean: 60
- standard deviation: 6
- score: 84
The number of standard deviations that 84 is from the mean is:
- k = (score - mean) / standar deviation
- k = (84 - 60) / 6 = 24 / 6 = 4
Thus, the score of the person is 4 standard deviations above the mean.
How good is that?
Chebyshev’s Theorem states that at least 1−1/k² of the data lie within k standard deviations of the mean. For k = 4, that is:
- 1 - 1/4² = 1 - 1/16 = 0.9375
- That means that half of 1 - 0.9375 are above k = 4: 0.03125
- Then, 1 - 0.03125 are below k = 4: 0.96875
Since there are 70 positions and 1,000 aplicants, 70/1,000 = 0.07. The compnay should select the best 0.07 of the applicants.
Given that the score of the person is among the 0.03125 upper fraction of the applicants, this person can count of geting one of the jobs.
