The Phoenicians came into contact with many other cultures who borrowed their ideas and customs when they traveled to trade. The Phoenicians sailed to trade and establish colonies where they spread their culture and economy. They sailed across the Mediterranean—through the Greek islands, southern Europe, the Atlantic Coast of Africa and Britain. The Phoenicians' passion for conquering horizons and setting up majestic trade networks established their civilization in places far from their homeland.
Schachter and Singer's study suggests that emotions are the result of both cognitive and physiological processes. According to their study, individuals respond in different ways to a shot of adrenaline and that will depend on the context they find themselves in. In this situational context, <u>if an individual is uninformed or misinformed about the effect of epinephrine and interacts with an angry person, he/she will show an angry response.</u>
Carl Jung would likely label Ingrid, who is energized by crowds, enjoys socializing, and speaks loudly and quickly as an <u>b. extrovert</u>.
<h3>Who is an extrovert?</h3>
An extrovert has a gregarious and unreserved personality. An extrovert seeks out social interactions and enjoys such interactions at all times.
The personality traits of an extrovert include:
- Affability
- Openness
- Conscientiousness
- Extroversion
- Agreeableness
- Neuroticism.
Extroverts do not behave like their opponents, called introverts.
Extroverts do not struggle, unlike introverts, to break out of their personal spaces.
Thus, Carl Jung would likely label Ingrid, who is energized by crowds, enjoys socializing, and speaks loudly and quickly as an <u>b. extrovert</u>.
Learn more about extroverts at brainly.com/answer expert verified
#SPJ1
<h3>Question Completion with Answer Options:</h3>
A. introvert
B. extrovert
C. arrogant
Answer:
In 1debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise. It had four parts: first, California would enter the Union as a free state; second, the status of slavery in the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided by the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be abolished in Washington, D.C.; and fourth, a new Fugitive Slave Act would enable Southerners to reclaim runaway slaves who had escaped to Northern states where slavery was not allowed.
Bleeding Kansas
But the larger question remained unanswered. In 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa and Missouri. According to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit slavery because both were north of the 36º30’ parallel. However, since no Southern legislator would approve a plan that would give more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with a middle ground that he called “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide for themselves whether their states would be slave or free.
Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their view, had caved to the demands of the “slaveocracy” at their expense. The battle for Kansas and Nebraska became a battle for the soul of the nation. Emigrants from Northern and Southern states tried to influence the vote. For example, thousands of Missourians flooded into Kansas in 1854 and 1855 to vote (fraudulently) in favor of slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established a rival government, and soon Kansas spiraled into civil war. Hundreds of people died in the fighting that ensued, known as “Bleeding Kansas.”
A decade later, the civil war in Kansas over the expansion of slavery was followed by a national civil war over the same issue. As Thomas Jefferson had predicted, it was the question of slavery in the West–a place that seemed to be the emblem of American freedom–that proved to be “the knell of the union.”
Answer:The nullification crisis was a United States sectional political crisis in 1832–33, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, which involved a confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government.
Explanation:
The nullification crisis was a United States sectional political crisis in 1832–33, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, which involved a confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government.
