Im pretty sure it is either a or d
The government sector collects taxes, which are considered <u>leakages</u>. Households provide <u>factors of production</u> to firms, which assists in the production of goods and services. The foreign sector purchases exports, which are considered<u> injectors</u>.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Firms and families go to the merchandise and enterprises advertise, where firms supply products and ventures and families devour these products and enterprises. Hence, pay goes from family units to firms (A) and firms give merchandise and ventures to families (B).
In a subsequent minute, the pay that is with the organizations is utilized with the variables of creation (capital and work) in the components advertise. Work is given by families, so salary is given to families through wages (C). At last, the families that work in the factor showcase produce the products that have a place with the organizations (D). At that point the cycle restarts! This cycle is known as the circular flow of income.
Personally speaking, I believe that if Talbot opened the article by presenting some historical background, the article would not engage the typical reader. This is because a lot of people find historical information uninteresting. Her opening in Paragraph 1, "Daniel Kennedy
remembers when he still thought that valedictorians were a good thing", is much better because it gives her the chance to engage more readers, more so because they probably have remembered
the fight for the title Valedictorian, or they have even been involved in it.
The statement is true.
In psychology, people who have an external locus of control believe that they cannot control the events that happen in their life, no matter how much they try to prevent something from happening. They believe that these events are caused by uncontrollable factors.
Believing that wars will always take place in societies, is an example of an external locus of control belief.
