Answer:
Explanation:
మీరు దేని గురించి మాట్లాడుతున్నారు?
The Articles could not simply be amended, but had to be replaced by a more effective government because it was practically impossible to change the document without the consent of all 13 states.
All 13 states would have to concur on a change because the Articles required unanimous consent for any amendments. That rule made it impossible for the Articles to be modified after the war with Britain ended in 1783 because of the rivalries between the states.
On November 15, 1777, the Continental Congress ratified the Articles of Confederation, the country's first constitution.
There was no taxing authority in Congress. Foreign and interstate commerce could not be regulated by Congress. Any laws passed by Congress were not enforced by the executive branch. There was no system of federal courts.
To know more about Article of confederation visit brainly.com/question/13608970?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ1
Many northern spectators (during the American Civil War) showed up at war zones (& generally could be seen picnicking as well as viewing battles from a far, for they believed that the South generally did not stand a chance against the North (as the North had a larger population (hence a larger army), as well as more equipments (as the North was more industrialized then the South), and that the South would not actually give a hard fight for their liberty.
~
America’s first treasury secretary and one of the three authors of the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton stands as one of the nation’s important early statesmen. Michael P. Federici places this Founding Father among the country’s original political philosophers as well.
Hamilton remains something of an enigma. Conservatives and liberals both claim him, and in his writings one can find material to support the positions of either camp. Taking a balanced and objective approach, Federici sorts through the written and historical record to reveal Hamilton’s philosophy as the synthetic product of a well-read and pragmatic figure whose intellectual genealogy drew on Classical thinkers such as Cicero and Plutarch, Christian theologians, and Enlightenment philosophers, including Hume and Montesquieu. In evaluating the thought of this republican and would-be empire builder, Federici explains that the apparent contradictions found in the Federalist Papers and other examples of Hamilton’s writings reflect both his practical engagement with debates over the French Revolution, capital expansion, commercialism, and other large issues of his time, and his search for a balance between central authority and federalism in the embryonic American government. This book challenges the view of Hamilton as a monarchist and shows him instead to be a strong advocate of American constitutionalism.
https://jhupbooks.press.jhu.edu/title/political-philosophy-alexander-hamilton
(Is this okay?)
