1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olganol [36]
4 years ago
12

What were the two reasons that the Polish government imposed martial law in Poland in the early 1980s?

History
1 answer:
Lapatulllka [165]4 years ago
6 0
The answer to this question is martial law refers to the period of time from December 13,1981 to July 22 1983 when the authoritarian communits government of the people's Republic of poland.
You might be interested in
The winner takes all system has made it very difficult for third party candidates to win state and national elections in the Uni
Thepotemich [5.8K]
Because it's always only been about these 2 parties. Republican and democrat. The third parties are just there... they never ever get enough votes to win, electoral or popular vote.
7 0
3 years ago
Please answer ASAP. You’re listening to a news report about a foreign government that often use scare tactics in sensors the med
Setler [38]
Totalitarianism! This is essentially a dictatorship in which the power of the government (typically a single person and a few trusted advisors) have absolute power over the people.
7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!
joja [24]
D. More land. more land equals more power.
6 0
3 years ago
A vaquero is someone that works the land, takes care of cattle and rides horses...What would vaquero translate to?
TiliK225 [7]
It would translate to a cowboy in English
8 0
3 years ago
In the space provided, summarize the case of Gibbons v. Ogden and explain its relationship to the Necessary and Proper Clause in
Tamiku [17]
Hi there!

Because this question has been posted before, I'll post my previous response here.

The case of Gibbons v. Ogden was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1824 concerning the power of the states to regulate interstate commerce. This case involved a steamboat owner, Thomas Gibbons, who did business between New York and New Jersey and the then governor of New Jersey, Aaron Ogden. Gibbons argued that the monopoly Ogden had was a violation of the commerce clause of the Constitution and therefore not valid. This proved to be the case. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court decided that this law conflicted with federal law and the powers the federal government had to regulate interstate commerce. Under the Constitution, Congress has all powers necessary and proper to carry into effect the laws that it passes. This reinforced that clause.
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was john locke known for?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the nazis anti-Semitic propaganda help contribute to the nazi campaign against Jewish peoples
    15·1 answer
  • Who won the french and indian war?
    5·1 answer
  • In the late 1840's, what led to the question of whether slavery should expand to the territories?
    7·1 answer
  • Why should Andrew Jackson be criticized?
    11·1 answer
  • What does herodotus question about the nile in this quote
    12·1 answer
  • The word botanical means?<br> Like an igloo/ snow<br> Like a storm<br> Plants/Flowers<br> Building
    13·2 answers
  • President George H.W. Bush helped Bill Clinton win the presidency in 1992 because Bush..
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the ordinary people do not like the rana rules​
    10·1 answer
  • Which box on the map<br> represents the legend?<br> A. A<br> B. B.<br> C C<br> D. D
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!