<h2>The End of Apartheid</h2>
Apartheid, the Afrikaans name given by the white-ruled South Africa's Nationalist Party in 1948 to the country's harsh, institutionalized system of racial segregation, came to an end in the early 1990s in a series of steps that led to the formation of a democratic government in 1994. Years of violent internal protest, weakening white commitment, international economic and cultural sanctions, economic struggles, and the end of the Cold War brought down white minority rule in Pretoria. U.S. policy toward the regime underwent a gradual but complete transformation that played an important conflicting role in Apartheid's initial survival and eventual downfall.
Although many of the segregationist policies dated back to the early decades of the twentieth century, it was the election of the Nationalist Party in 1948 that marked the beginning of legalized racism's harshest features called Apartheid. The Cold War then was in its early stages. U.S. President Harry Truman's foremost foreign policy goal was to limit Soviet expansion. Despite supporting a domestic civil rights agenda to further the rights of black people in the United States, the Truman Administration chose not to protest the anti-communist South African government's system of Apartheid in an effort to maintain an ally against the Soviet Union in southern Africa. This set the stage for successive administrations to quietly support the Apartheid regime as a stalwart ally against the spread of communism.
the answer is: A cognitive psychologist enrolls undergraduate students for a computer-based study about the effect of mood on problem-solving behaviors.
Here the requirement for research with human subjects according to the Fed :
"Obtains information or biospecimens through intervention or interaction with the individual, and uses, studies, or analyzes the information or biospecimens; or Obtains, uses, studies, analyzes, or generates identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens."
The experiment on this ption fulfill the criteria because:
- The experiment should use studies or analytics to obtain some sort of private information from the subjects. (such as their mood)
- The experiment should make some sort of intervention that can be used to measure its hypothesis. (in the case above, the researchers could put the subject under a certain level of stress before telling them to solve a set of problems)
- The researchers need to interact with the subject in a certain way. (since the researchers meet the undergraduate directly, it's considered as an interraction)
Culture doesn't really have aims; it's an by-product of human social behaviour, something that people create as they live in groups and satisfy their other needs. It's functions are to "remember" certain behaviours that worked in the past, such as certain ways of preparing food.
Lobbyists can provide valuable information, political intelligence, and reelection funding, making legislators with whom they agree more effective.
<h3>What are Lobbyists?</h3>
- Professional advocates who work to sway political outcomes on behalf of people and organizations are known as lobbyists.
- This campaigning may result in the introduction of new legislation or the revision of already-enacted rules and regulations.
- In politics, lobbying, persuasion, or interest representation refers to the practice of legally attempting to influence the decisions, actions, or policies of public servants, most frequently politicians or regulators.
- Many different sorts of persons, associations, and organized groups, including those in the private sector, corporations, other legislators or government officials, or advocacy groups, engage in lobbying, which typically entails direct, face-to-face interaction.
- A legislator's constituents can include lobbyists, which refers to a voter or group of voters in their electoral district, or they can lobby on behalf of a company.
To know more about Lobbying refer to:
brainly.com/question/11846833
#SPJ4
