Answer:
Questioned him to gain privileged information.
Explanation:
Towards the end of the passage, we learn from the speaker that Bradford <em>was a crafty old sophister. </em>
<em>Sophisters</em><em> </em>or<em> sophists </em>were pre-Socratic philosophers whose domain of expertise were skills that can be compared to modern day advocacy, manipulating arguments so as to convince their interlocutors of anything at anytime.
The primary meaning of the word <em>art </em>is skill, <em>artful </em>here meaning <em>skillful</em>. If Bradford were a sophister, that would mean he knew just what to say or do, in order to get what he wanted. And it is exactly what he did. He managed to go unnoticed and get the information he wanted from Keimer thanks to his <em>artful questions.</em>
Answer: It perpetuates the two-party system because minor parties do not attract a wide enough range of supporters to win.
Explanation:
The United States may be a democracy but it is one that is run by two parties. Minor parties do not have the reach, support or financing to challenge the great Republican and Democratic parties which is why in other to get enough votes to get into the major offices, one simply must belong to one of the two parties.
This is what the scenario above depicts. The plurality system assigs electoral votes to the candidate with the highest vote in the state and with the Reds and the Blues having support too wide to surmount, the system favors them and perpetuates their dominance.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
hope this helps but it might be wrong
Answer:
the roman empire was very successful
Explanation:
it had an expansive area with vast resources, a strong economy, and advanced military
Answer:
In this Federalist Paper, Alexander Hamilton argues for a strong executive ... THERE is an idea, which is not without its advocates, that a vigorous ... The enlightened well-wishers to this species of government must at least hope that the supposition is destitute of foundation; since they can never admit its truth, Explanation:
