Answer – Quitting your job to find another
Quitting your job to find another might not be an option for increasing your present income. As a matter of fact, doing so lead to a reduction of income if a less-paying job is found after quitting the current one, or worse still total lack of income if no job is found after quitting the present job. In simple terms, if you quit your present job, there is no guarantee that you’ll find a better one. A more feasible option would be to start looking for a better job without quitting your old job. Better still, if the options are available, you may request a promotion at your present job or request a merit increase in pay.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The expected value of each course of action in a decision tree is not determined by starting at the beginning of the tree, instead it is a process because you need to make a desition and in some extend you espect to have some results but some of them are uncertain or unespected. in this kind of scheme Squares represent decisions, and circles represent uncertain outcomes. Then you need to calcule the desition nodes giving each option a cost or value, This will give you a value that represents the benefit of each decision. at the end calculating choose the option that has the largest benefit, and take that as the decision made. This is the value of that decision node.
Answer:
first-mover advantage
Explanation:
First-mover advantage refers to the strategic advantage achieved by the first company that occupies a market segment. In order for a company to gain first-mover advantage it must be the first company to enter a market or at least be the first company to gain competitive advantage in that market.
Unidice is the first company to gain competitive advantage in the data system market because its processing speed is much higher than its competitors.
Sometimes you don't need to be the first one to enter a market, but you need to be the first one to do things right. For example, Microsoft introduced the Surface tablet almost a decade before Apple introduced the iPad, but Apple did it right, therefore Apple gained first mover advantage.
Answer:
-3.28
Explanation:
Given that,
Initial quantity, Q1 = 2
Final quantity, Q2 = 0
Change in quantity = Q2 - Q1
= 0 - 2
= -2
Initial income, M1 = $8
Final income, M2 = $15
Change in Income = M2 - M1
= $15 - $8
= $7
Average quantity:
= (2 + 0) ÷ 2
= 1
Average income:
= (15 + 8) ÷ 2
= 11.5
Therefore,
Percentage change in quantity demanded:
= (Change in quantity demanded ÷ Average quantity) × 100
= (-2 ÷ 1) × 100
= -200%
Percentage change in income:
= (Change in income ÷ Average income) × 100
= (7 ÷ 11.5) × 100
= 60.87%
Income elasticity of demand:
= Percentage change in quantity demanded ÷ Percentage change in income
= -200 ÷ 60.87
= -3.28
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
In this scenario when Rob stops nagging Jeff he is implementing the behavior modification known as avoidance learning. This technique theorizes that and individual tends to remove themselves from a scenario in order to avoid certain bad or stress inducing situation. Which Rob does in order to avoid having to deal with Jeff being cracking jokes and goofing off later.
