Answer:
simple
Explanation:
A simple sentence contains one independent clause with a subject and a predicate. Besides, it makes sense on its own and does not possess any dependent clauses. Thus, even though the subject <em>Joe King</em> is followed by an appositive phrase which identifies him -<em>an engineering professor from California</em>- the sentence still has one single independent clause consisting of a subject and a predicate.
You could write about how police dogs are helpful, what they do, or the breeds of police dogs.
This is unusual because one is more likely to be not a witch than be one as no one knows what makes a witch for certain.
Explanation:
In Act 3 of the play Martha Corey must tell the court and convince them that the allegation against her for being a witch is false.
She does this by giving her logic the way she can but is asked this bizarre question “How do you know, then, that you are not a witch?”.
The fault in the question is that by probability one cannot know someone to be a witch by guess because witches do not exist or as they believed in their time were rare.
So, for a woman to be declared one, the court would need definite proof for it to be true.
This is the reason why can't some substances dissolve in water and chemically: Water is a polar molecule. If a solute dissolved in water is polar molecule, it will dissolve in water. If a solute dissolved in water is non-polar like oil it will not dissolve in water.
b/c polar dissolves in polar
The father had the son physically, but that did not mean he was his actual father if he did not care for him as his son
Example: a father had a son and abandoned him. The son was then adopted by his caring (real) father
