What was a major problem with the central government under the Articles of Confederation?

2 answers:

5 0

"Congress depended on the states for raising funds and defense" was a major problem with the central government under the Articles of Confederation. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or the penultimate option. I hope it helps you.

Tema [17]4 years ago

3 0

The correct answer here is third option.

The main problem with the Articles of Confederation was that the federal government was simply too weak to establish and maintain order. The government depended on the states for funding and military as it did not have the power to levy taxes and provide the army it needed to be efficient. That is one of the major reasons why the Articles were replaced with a constitution.

You might be interested in

What’s the correct answer

avanturin [10]

I believe it is known as the premium.

7 0

4 years ago

Which of the following is true about policing during the formation of the colonies?

Bezzdna [24]

Though there are no options available in the question, however, the following is true about policing during the formation of the colonies are:

There are constables: these are elected by the American colonists

There are night watches: this patrol the cities against fire, crime, and chaos

There are slave patrols: these catch escaping slaves

There are sheriffs: these are appointed by the Governor of the colony.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are different sections of the policing formation in the American colony.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20027745

5 0

3 years ago

The dark ages began with the collapse of the ____ impire. A. german B. roman C. persian D.british

rewona [7]

T began with the fall of the Western Roman Empire and merged into the Renaissance and the Age of Discovery.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why would Congress not seat newly elected senators and representatives from southern states?

miss Akunina [59]

Throughout the history of the United States Congress there have been times when members of either chamber have refused to seat new members. Article I, Section 5 of the United States Constitution states that, "Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner, and under such penalties as each House may provide." This means that members of the House of Representatives and of the Senate can refuse to recognize the election or appointment of a new representative or senator. They can bar the individual outright or refer the matter to a committee for inquiry. Powell v. McCormack (1969) clarified the issue of the scope of powers of the Congress to refuse to seat an elected member. The Federal Contested Elections Act of 1969 currently lays out the procedures by which each House determines contested elections.

4 0

3 years ago

Which of the following series of events is listed in proper sequence? A. Founding of Massachusetts Bay Colony; founding of Plymo

Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

The answer is 'B. Mayflower Compact; Trial of Anne Hutchinson; Half-Way Covenant'

Explanation:

Option B lists the three events in the correct order. Mayflower Compact (1620). Trial of Anne Hutchinson (1637) and Half-Way Covenant (1662).

The dates of each event in the incorrect options are provided below as well for reference.

A. 1629, 1620 and 1607

C. 1618, 1649 and 1612

D. 1642, 1533 and 1584

8 0

4 years ago