Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
The first thing I notice is the slope, which is going down, which means this is for sure a negative slope. So any slopes that just include 5 is now crossed off. And since the formula goes like y=mx+b, I believe the answer would be C, because it actually follows the formula as it should. If I'm wrong, pick D for sure.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
It makes the equation false because the answer on one side is false.
2(-4) + 0 = -8(-4) - 0 = -4
-8 + 0 = 32 - 0 = -4
-8 = 32 = -4
-8 does not equal 32. The equation is unbalanced.
So, the answer will be C) The ordered pair (−4, 0) is not a solution to the system because it makes at least one of the equations false.
Hope this helps
-Amelia
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The given inequality is
To solve this inequality, we just have to isolate
Therefore, the solutions for this inequality is .
If we graph this inequality, the solution would be like the image attached.
If you would like to know if Miles is going to spend more or fewer hours bicycling this week than last week, you can calculate this using the following steps:
2/3 as many hours:
2/3 * x hours
Because 2/3 is less than 3/3 = 1, this means that Miles is going to spend fewer hours bicycling this week than last week.
Answer:
$130
Step-by-step explanation:
Cost = 85
To make 30% profit, he would need to sell them at:
85 + (0.3)(85) = 110.5
Now, he would need to sell them at 110.5 AFTER giving a 15% discount. So essentially we are asking, "<em>What number discounted (decreased) by 15% would give us 110.5??"</em>
<em />
We can let that price be x and write the equation:
x - (0.15)(x) = 110.5
x - 0.15x = 110.5
0.85x = 110.5
x = 110.5/0.85 = 130
The retailer should mark the jacket at $130