1. No do not borrow because that is an item you want but don’t need
2. Yes would borrow because reliable transportation is something you need for work
3. No would not borrow because you do not need a brand new pair of shoes you seen
4. No would not borrow because you do not need a skateboard
I don't see any underlined words in the sentence. However, I'll just post my answer based on my understanding.
Where there is water ⇒ subordinate clause
There are mosquitoes ⇒ independent clause
Independent clause is a complete sentence. It has a subject, a verb, and expresses a complete thought.
Subordinate clause is a dependent clause that starts with a conjunction. It also has a subject and a verb but it is dependent on the main clause.
Kafka uses peculiar and round-about ways of saying things when talking about Gregor in order to convey the complications that Gregor's personality presents. Gregor is a man who is completely controlled by the expectations that society and his family have of him. He knows that he should work hard, be responsible, sacrifice everything for his family and be the breadwinner. These are the expectations that dominate his whole life. The reason why he is so overwhelmed by them is because these stem from his social context, and not from his personal goals or dreams.
Kafka choice of language in this passage reflects this feeling. Gregor is constantly doing what he <em>ought</em> to do, and not what he <em>wants</em> to do or what he believes in. Even when going through extremely frightening and confusing situations, he remembers that what he ought to do is remain calm. And he strives to satisfy this expectation, regardless of what his true feelings might be.
Based on the information given, it can be depicted that the irony about the trial is D. The trial operates both kindly and unfairly, which is an ironic paradox.
An irony simply means a speech or action is the opposite of what it's expected to do. It should be noted that the aim of irony is typically to create a humorous effect.
It should be noted that the thing that's ironic about the trial mentioned in these lines is that the trial operates both kindly and unfairly, which is an ironic paradox. Kind and unfair contradict themselves in this case.
Learn more about irony on:
brainly.com/question/25820907
a. three major supporting details.
There are three supporting details for the main idea on the theories to explain why people yawn. Each of the supporting details contains a key word or phrase to indicate that they indeed are a main supporting detail. These key words and phrases are "One explanation is...", "A second theory...", and "Yet another explanation...". These all show the supporting detail is contained in the sentence. The last sentences just build and connect to information that has already been introduced.
