Answer:
Gross margin= $744,760
Explanation:
<u>The absorption costing method includes all costs related to production, both fixed and variable.</u> The unit product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and total unitary manufacturing overhead.
Unitary fixed overhead= 52,900 / 21,500= $2.46
Total unitary production cost= 10.3 + 12.3 + 3.3 + 2.46= $28.36
<u>Now, the gross margin:</u>
Gross margin= sales - COGS
Gross margin= 21,500*63 - 21,500*(28.36)
Gross margin= $744,760
The guard prevents you from touching the blade.
Answer and Explanation:
a. The given statement is true as the corner point at the objective function should be feasible solution which is no longer as compared with the value for every adjacent CPF solution as compared with its optimal
b. The given statement is false as the solution can be an edge
c. The given statement is true as it shows the direct relation between the two things
Answer:
c. measures changes in quantity demanded more accurately than elasticity.
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, slope measures changes in quantity demanded very accurately compared to elasticity. The main for this reason is that m, slope and elasticity are not the same concepts. Slope evaluates the
flatness or steepness of a line in terms of the evaluating units for price and quantity, while elasticity evaluates the relative response of quantity to changes in price.
Answer:
a. Long
b. $375.00
Explanation:
a. If interest rates decrease over the period of investment, Treasury bond prices will increase. Thus, Dudley Savings Bank should take a long position in the futures contracts on the Treasury bonds. As T-bond prices go up, so will T-bond futures prices.
b. Given a long position:
Net profit = Sale price of futures − Purchase price of futures
= $107,687.50 − $107,312.50 = $375.00
Purchase price of futures = 107 − 100 = 107 10/32% × $100,000 = $107,312.50
Sale price of futures = 107 − 220 = 107 22/32% × $100,000 = $107,687.50
Explanation: