Consent is vitiated when it has been obtained by duress of such a nature as to cause a reasonable fear of unjust and considerable injury to a party's person, property, or reputation.
<h3>What is consent?</h3>
When one person voluntarily accepts another's request or wish, this is known as consent. It is a term that is used frequently and has precise definitions in a variety of contexts, including law, medicine, research, and intimate relationships. Consent may not mean the same thing when used in certain settings.
when someone uses coercive tactics, such as threats that are illegal, to get another person to act in a way that they otherwise wouldn't. commercial pursuits are called duress.
The four components needed to demonstrate duress are:
- Threats of death or severe physical harm are required.
- The harm that is threatened must outweigh the harm that results from the crime.
- The danger must be present now and unavoidable.
- The defendant must not have been at fault for getting into the predicament.
To know more about duress refer to: brainly.com/question/14617599
#SPJ4
The southern delegates to the Constitutional Convention were willing to accept the Three-Fifths Compromise because it increased the political influence of the South.
<h3>What is the Three-fifths compromise?</h3>
By the Three-fifths compromise, the Northern and Southern state's delegates at the United States Constitutional Convention of 1787 agreed that three-fifth of the population of slaves would be counted in determining representation and number of seats in the Congress.
It also would determine how much each state would pay in taxes.
The three-fifths compromise allowed Southern states more Representatives and more presidential electoral votes than if slaves had not been counted although slaves had no voting rights.
Therefore, the Three-fifths compromise increased the political influence of the South by granting them more representation and electoral power.
Read more about southern delegates accepting the three-fifths compromise at brainly.com/question/7663707
#SPJ1
In a two-way ANOVA, the researcher makes decisions regarding <u>three separate</u> when the omnibus test is significant.
A two-way ANOVA is used to estimate how the mean of quantitative variable changes in keeping with the levels of categorical variables. Use a two-way ANOVA while you need to know how two independent variables, in aggregate, affect a dependent variable.
The only-way ANOVA has considered an omnibus check due to the fact the F check indicates whether or not the version is great average—i.e., whether or now not there are any enormous differences within the means between any of the agencies.
A two-way ANOVA with replication assessments 3 null hypotheses: that the method of observations grouped by using one factor are the identical; that the method of observations grouped by way of the other issue are the identical; and that there's no interplay between the 2 elements.
Learn more about two-way ANOVA here: brainly.com/question/23638404
#SPJ4
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Mavis believes that the girls from the nice neighborhood on the north side of town are all stuck-up and white. She has noticed a correlation between this group of girls and how they act above other people at the mall. Mavis's example of stereotypes and prejudice support the ________ theory.
a. motivational
b. learning
c. cognitive
d. dispositional
Answer:
Mavis's example of stereotypes and prejudice support the c. cognitive theory.
Explanation:
In cognitive theory, <u>behaviors are explained by understanding the mental processes behind them. </u>In other words, the focus is not on the behavior per se, but on the thought processes that led to its existence. <u>The example we are studying here seems to characterize an explanation from a cognitive perspective. Notice that Mavis's behavior is being explained through a tracking of her thought process - she has a certain stereotype for a certain reason. She is not being prejudice out of the blue, there is mental path that was taken. Mavis associated that group of girls and how they act above other people at the mall.</u>
Answer:
The correct response is Option D) beliefs or institutions.
Explanation:
An iconoclast is someone who attacks the status quo, especially those aspects having to do with social conventions and power. Traditionally the term was used for those who went against established religions and religious symbols in particular, but now it refers to someone who goes against social conventions in general, especially those that are institutionalized into society. An iconoclast believes that the established institution is wrong or acting against the best interests of society for its own continuance or gain.
