Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
In simple words, Regardless of the expense of making guitars, the technique reduces the total cost of manufacturing a instrument. Phoenix would be in the production business of instruments, not pickups.
The target of this technique is therefore the entire guitar, not really the pickups. The smaller the process of manufacturing their instruments, the better manoeuvrability they have on the market. When they have reduced costs, they may change rates downwards in order to capture further market penetration.
Answer:
Present value = $21,804 (approx)
Explanation:
Given:
Periodic payment = $3,200
Number of period = 12
Interest rate = 10% = 10/100 = 0.1
Present value = ?
Computation of Present value:
![Present\ value = PMT[\frac{1-(1+r)^{-n}}{r} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-(1+0.1)^{-12}}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-(1.1)^{-12}}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-0.318630818}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{0.681369182}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 21,803.6188](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Present%5C%20value%20%3D%20PMT%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2Br%29%5E%7B-n%7D%7D%7Br%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2B0.1%29%5E%7B-12%7D%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281.1%29%5E%7B-12%7D%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-0.318630818%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B0.681369182%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%2021%2C803.6188)
Present value = $21,804 (approx)
Answer:
c. $59,000
Explanation:
The cash flow statements shows the effect of the company's activities on cash. These activities are classed into operating, investing and financing activities.
When an asset is sold, the amount received from the sale is an inflow of cash to the company. This inflow is recognized in the investing segment of the cas flow statement.
Hence, the amount that should be reported as a source of cash under cash flows from investing activities is $59,000.
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.
