Answer:
Direct material price variance= $21,450
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Direct materials 4 pounds $4.70 per pound
May:
Jackson purchased 107,250 pounds of direct material at a total cost of $525,525.
To calculate the direct material price variance, we need to use the following formula:
Direct material price variance= (standard price - actual price)*actual quantity
Actual price= 525,525/107,250= $4.9
Direct material price variance= (4.7 - 4.9)*107,250
Direct material price variance= $21,450
Answer: Commodity
Explanation: I believe this is the answer because Commodity money actually presents value because it can be valuable in different ways such as gold and silver.
Answer:
Part a. Compute the unit product cost under absorption costing.
Variable costs per unit:
Direct materials $ 165
Direct labor $ 72
Variable manufacturing overhead $ 8
Fixed Overheads per unit:
Fixed manufacturing overhead ($535,500/10,500) $ 51
Unit product cost $296
Part b. Compute the unit product cost under variable costing.
Variable costs per unit:
Direct materials $ 165
Direct labor $ 72
Variable manufacturing overhead $ 8
Unit product cost $245
Explanation:
Part a. Compute the unit product cost under absorption costing.
Absorption costing treats fixed overheads as part of product cost and hence fixed manufacturing overheads are included in unit product cost at their absorption rate
Part b. Compute the unit product cost under variable costing.
Variable Costing System treats fixed overheads as a Period Cost and not part of product cost hence fixed manufacturing overheads are excluded in unit product cost
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
Of countries?
Probably you mean Thailand then.
