Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:The most valuable end of government is the liberty of its inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege."—Patrick Henry1.
Explanation:
Answer: check explanation.
Explanation:
Computer Forensics involves the techniques used in gathering evidence from a particular computing device. The evidence gathered from computer Forensics should be suitable for presentation in a law court.
Computer Forensic investigator need to consider some properties such as the corrosive elements, static electricity, temperature and the magnetic field when packaging and transporting evidence.
Computer Forensic investigators follow set of procedures for their analysis;
(1). physical isolation of the device in question so as to make sure it cannot be contaminated accidentally, and (2). digital copy of the device's storage media should be made and locked in a secure facility.
