Answer:
declared that separate educational facilities were unlawful
Explanation:
The Brown v. Board of Education was established in 1954 and created an opposition to the Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 who affirmed the legality of racial segregation in public places such as buses, schools, squares, hospitals and other places. This opposition was established because at the end of the Brown v. The Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that educational institutions that established systems of racial segregation would be acting illegally and that from that moment on they should promote full equal education to all students, regardless of their colors or races.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
makes the most sense in my opinion
Answer:
if he didn't pay rent to either himself or his mother that is really not good on his part
Explanation:
if he doesn't pay it can take it too court and if i do so i can make a difference and then he can pay the rent too his mom
Answer: Because the suspect may have a reason for his or her fiber being there.
Explanation: if they are a roommate, friend, or someone who had access to the crime scene, the evidence of a matching fiber could easily be explained away. It is best to question a suspect about if they had been to that location before. If they say no, they are locked into that answer, thus there is no innocent excuse for the fiber being present.
Answer:
In sex crimes, the victim interview is usually your main evidence and your main source of evidence leads, more so than with any other crime. At the same time, the sex crime victim's telling of their stories is usually much more inhibited, guarded, and vulnerable to distortion than for victims of other crimes. Complicating the picture even more, no other crime victim interview tends to make the interviewer feel more uncertain about how best to proceed.DON'T - start your interview without again dedicating three or four minutes solely to addressing the victim's needs and concerns.
Sex crimes victims almost always arrive at the interview plagued with shame, anxieties, misinformation, and with fears of being judged. Even more significant, they usually come to these interviews still very uncertain about whether or not they really want to be going forward with the justice process.
This state of mind is in stark contrast, for example, to a robbery victim who is completely unconflicted about their outrage and can't wait to get the story on the record. As long as these anxieties and uncertainties of sex crimes victims remain unaddressed, chances are they're going to be very hesitant and holding back.
Explanation:
