Anyone good at this?? Please help me. I attempted at this and I don’t think my answer is correct!
1 answer:
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
There are two ways you could do this question. You could graph it with something like Desmos or you could put a couple of x values in for f(x). I'll do the latter first. When you understand it, try putting it into Desmos.
f(x) = (3/4)^x
f(0) = (3/4)^0
f(0) = 1
=======
f(x) = (3/4)^x
f(1) = 3/4
=========
g(x) = (3/4)^x - 6
g(0) = (3/4)^0 - 6
g(0) = 1 - 6
g(0) = - 5
========
g(x) = (3/4)^x - 6
g(1) = (3/4)^1 - 6
g(1)= 3/4 - 6
g(1) = -5 1/4
Conclusion
It looks like the graph has shifted down 6.
Answer
A
You might be interested in
In box 1, the reason that justifies the statement, m∠BAD = m∠BAC + m∠CAD, is: angle addition postulate.
<h3>What is the Angle Addition Postulate?</h3>The angle addition postulate states that the measure of a larger angle equals the sum of smaller angles that make up the larger angle.
∠BAD comprises of ∠BAC and ∠CAD.
Therefore, based on the angle addition postulate, m∠BAD = m∠BAC + m∠CAD.
The missing reason in box 1 would be: angle addition postulate.
Learn more about angle addition postulate on:
#SPJ5
