1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashutka [201]
3 years ago
7

Food is valuable in Elizabethan England, far more so than in the modern world. A flock of 180 sheep is worth more than the avera

ge detached house. The difficulties of transportation mean that the food supply depends heavily on what grows locally and how much surplus is available. It also depends on the season. Harvest is obviously a time of much grain and fruit. –The Time Traveler’s Guide to Elizabethan England, Ian Mortimer Which details are stated explicitly? Check all that apply.
A. Food is extremely valuable today.
B. A flock of sheep in Elizabethan England was more valuable than a modern house.
C. Transportation was difficult in Elizabethan England.
D. The food supply in Elizabethan England depended on what was grown locally. E. Elizabethan England experienced four distinct seasons.
English
2 answers:
Sliva [168]3 years ago
9 0

Answer:

B, C, and D are the correct answers.

Explanation:

Just got it right.

Mrac [35]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

D

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Sixen grade
Arturiano [62]
Pretty sure the first one
5 0
2 years ago
Why did holling think romeo and juliet was stupid wednesday wars?
Dafna1 [17]

In “The Wednesday Wars January-February,” Holling was not an admirer of the William Shakespeare play, _Romeo and Juliet_.   In fact, Holling thought the play _Romeo and Juliet_ was stupid, not because it was silly or because it did not make sense; rather, Holling thought the play was stupid because Romeo and Juliet died for love. 






4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. How, according to Diana George, is poverty
liq [111]

Answer:

To Diana George, poverty is represented by non-profit organizations such Habitat for Humanity in a way of despair, or something that can be easily seen or recognized. Or in the case of this organization and many others, it tries as to find an surfire way to make others empathise with poverty. The problems George identifies as a result of this tactic is that poverty is not always easily recognized, and on even questions that “If it doesn’t look like poverty, then how do we adress it?” (p. 450) The largest, most pressing issue is that seeing poverty in one way instead limits our understanding on how to deal with poverty.

At the very beginning of the article, George creates an anecdote of how she encounters charities. It details her going through her mail and looking over many other poverty organization’s mail. This shows their tactic, of presenting poverty as grim and ragged, while a quote from bell hooks before that states that seeing poverty in one way challenges how people look and deal with it. Providing these two largely contrasting viewpoints, in a way, makes them appeal to different audiences by expressing both her issue and a counterclaim to structure the remainder of textual analysis.

The purpose of George’s textual analysis is to ultimately show that representing poverty as weak and depraving only hinders the fight against it instead of resolving it. Everyday, it’s a question of who is poor and who is not, but that itself is becoming increasingly difficult to tell. This rudimentary mindset eventually leads George to state that “There are certainly many cultural and political reasons for these problems…but I would suggest that the way the way poverty countinues to be represented in this country and on tapes limits our understanding.” So if people continue to see poverty in this sight, the ones that are poor but still have a home or job will challenge this belief. People will not know how to deal with them, and this essentially why George criticizes non-profit organizations such as Health for Habitat

4 0
3 years ago
I need help i don’t know??
Nitella [24]
I think it’s a sorry if I’m wrong
8 0
2 years ago
Question 4 (5 points)<br> An effective conclusion to an expository text should (5 points)
Alla [95]

Answer:

It summarized the text but doesn't restate it word for word

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • which theme best describes the text? History and evidence of things past can be interesting to study. History and evidence of th
    11·1 answer
  • What evidence does Wiesel provide to support the idea that even though the prisoners we’re all going through something horrible
    10·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from "The Lady Maid's Bell." I had been near a week at Brympton before I saw my master. Word came that he was a
    10·2 answers
  • Written Production. In 120-150 write about the most precious object you have. Write how you received this object, describe it, a
    9·1 answer
  • “Conceit” is best defined as a lengthy or extended. True or false
    15·2 answers
  • Jefferson begins the introduction to the Declaration of Independence by stating his major premise and giving examples then expla
    6·2 answers
  • Describe Miss narwin view towards students and education today​
    7·1 answer
  • The author includes the following sentence in the text to provide
    11·1 answer
  • Sandy is trying to determine which career she would like to pursue. To aid in her decision, she spoke to friends and family abou
    14·1 answer
  • Which one is correct?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!