Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
D) Rifting adds new rock to a continent and cause the continent to become wider.
Hope that helped, Good luck! (:
Answer:
I say true, the government needs to be payed, and so does the public services.
Explanation:
The trainer is using the method of successive approximations. In addition, successive approximation is a sequence of rewards that offer positive reinforcement for behavior variations that are successive steps on the way to the final preferred. The theory was first created and used by Skinner, who is recognized for his theories that contain learning behaviors by means of reinforcement. The theory includes reinforcing behavior that is successively closer and closer to the approximations of the anticipated or directed behavior.
