In the given context Dr, Anderson should use cross sectional research approach to fulfill his requirements.
<h3>What is research?</h3>
Research is referred to as the creation of a new concept based on experiments and deep study of the concept verified by the sources to use it professionly.
The cross-sectional approach of research helps the researcher to measure all the outcomes of the study at the same time. This will be used to identify the different traits of the participants of the research.
Dr. Anderson wants to study the development of depression based on age and gender which reflects two traits of personality, so he should use the cross-sectional approach of research to receive outcomes at the same time.
Learn more about research, here:
brainly.com/question/18723483
#SPJ1
Answer: Option (D)
Explanation:
From the given case or scenario, we can state that since there are no additional changes are made then the following statement in accordance with the review of revised protocol is correct, i.e. Unless or until nature of these questions would tend to keep the scale of the risk to mere more than the minimal for the adolescents, then the research would be more likely to still qualify for the expedited review.
This "Necessary and Proper Clause" (sometimes also called the "Elastic Clause") grants Congress a set of so-called implied powers—that is, powers not explicitly named in the Constitution but assumed to exist due to their being necessary to implement the expressed powers that are named in Article I.
Should Elton's deception be discovered, he could be charged with Insurance Fraud, for breaking the conditions and the terms of the car insurance contract he agreed upon with the company. The fact that he sought opportunity for profit, by reporting falsely, he broke the Principle of Utmost Good Faith, which requires the complete information from the person getting the insurance.
