Answer:
Change in Investment (Government Spending) = $200
Explanation:
Multiplier = k =∆Y/∆I = 1/(1-MPC)
Needed ∆Y = $1000 ; MPC = 0.8
1000/ ∆I = 1 / (1-0.8)
1000/∆I = 1 / 0.2
1000/∆I = 5
∆I = 1000/5
∆I = 200
Answer:
Explanation:
INCAPITALIST SYSTEM ,INDIVIDUALS ARE KEY BECAUSE THE GOVERMENT DOES NOT CONTROL ECONOMY .ALL ECONOMIC DECISIONS AND ACTIONS ARE CONTROLLED.......
Answer:
Hanna is correct.
Explanation:
The sale of the 2004 Dodge cannot be construed to be a sale of goods under the Uniform Commercial Code since this law covers sales of goods by merchants. Hanna cannot be said to be a merchant of 2004 Dodge as she is not known to be in the business for the purchase and sale of cars. Therefore, the case should be adjudicated under the common law. What has taken place in this instance is the exchange of a personal asset. Hanna cannot make a trading profit from the sale, but a capital gain. Rachel is not correct.
Minor criminal offense, specifically a strict liability offense. Strict liability refers to an offense made regardless of the the intent of action. In other words, even if you have no malicious intent, you are still liable for the offense. Another example is possession of drugs.
Based on Hope's check, her contribution to her RETIREMENT plan b. is pre-tax and therefore not included in federal income taxes.
<h3>What does the check say?</h3>
The check notes that Hope's retirement contribution is not included in her federal taxable income.
This means that the contribution is paid pre-tax and will not be liable for federal income taxes. She will most probably pay taxes on the retirement fund when she withdraws from it.
Find out more on retirement contributions at brainly.com/question/6806179.
