Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
Answer:
Crowding out indicate high interest due to which private investment reduces.
Explanation:
Crowding out indicate high interest due to which private investment reduces.
during the competition of borrowing the saving money, the rate of interest rises which affect the private saving to rise.
crowding effects can be decrease by decreasing the rate of interest which increased the supply of currency which directly boost the exports.
The correct answer would be option B, Congress wrote regulations regarding its details.
Explanation:
The law mentioned in the given question was regarding the protection of rights of disabled people. This law became effective in 1992. After the passing of this law, the Congress wrote regulations regarding the details of this law.
This law says that no covered entity shall discriminate against a qualified individual on the basis of disability in regard to:
- Job application procedures
- Hiring Advancement
- Discharge of Employees
- Employees Compensation
- Job Training
- Other terms, conditions and privileges of employment
Learn more about the law for disables at:
brainly.com/question/11907469
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
he set aside his qualms about the government's powers under the Constitution in order to purchase the Louisiana Territory.
Explanation:
