1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rudiy27
4 years ago
15

Compare and contrast Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of s

ocial stratification. After your comparison, indicate which theory you agree with and why?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Alex Ar [27]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>

Explanation:

Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the  position of an individual.  They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.

The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.

While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.

In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.

You might be interested in
Each decision makers wants to make a choice that _satisfaction.
Naya [18.7K]

Each decision makers wants to make a choice that <u>maximizes </u>satisfaction.

The  decision makers want to make choices that are ideas that satisfy them completely, so when are gonna make a decision they analyze all well.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the chinese government respond to political criticism?
natulia [17]
I think they arrested people who disagreed with the government. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The three major political parties in Nigeria as of 1959​
liubo4ka [24]
Hahahaha is she should end
7 0
3 years ago
A person who believes in the philosophy "the end justifies the means" is manipulative and is viewed by some as being ruthless, e
vampirchik [111]
<span>A person who believes in the philosophy "the end justifies the means" is manipulative and is viewed by some as being ruthless, exhibits tendencies of Machiavellianism. Machiavellianism is a term in psychology that refers to a person's character of being self-centered, deceiving, manipulative and coerced others into achieving one's goals. The example mentioned is showing signs of manipulation and ill intentions.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What led both Herodotus and Thucydides to write history?
polet [3.4K]

Answer:

A peace treaty between Athens and Sparta did not last long, and in 431 B.C. the Peloponnesian War began. Fighting in Greece continued for most of the next 27 years. Herodotus was still alive at the start of the Peloponnesian War, but another Greek, Thucydides, would write its history.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Economists make predictions about individual behavior based on the assumption that people exploit opportunities to make themselv
    7·1 answer
  • Folkways are norms that are seen as central to the functioning of a society and to its social life. The routine conventions of e
    6·1 answer
  • ___ is a common flower that can be quite helpful in cases of mild depression
    11·1 answer
  • What does the point on the graph represent?
    8·1 answer
  • 3.4 Do you think the Wellness Foundation can boost Technogym’s turnover? Why or why not?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which terrorist group has been a major force in the conflicts in iraq
    14·2 answers
  • Collette has always been an independent woman, but once she moved into a skilled nursing home, she feels helpless and dependent
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 20 POINTS!!!
    13·1 answer
  • What immigrant group primarily settled in Texas?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the Administration of Justice Act change local government?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!