Answer:
...“The father of modern economics supported a limited role for government. Mark Skousen writes in "The Making of Modern Economics", Adam Smith believed that, "Government should limit its activities to administer justice, enforcing private property rights, and defending the nation against aggression." The point is that the farther a government gets away from this limited role, the more that government strays from the ideal path... How this issue is handled will decide whether the country can more closely follow Adam Smith's prescription for growth and wealth creation or move farther away from it.”
Jacob Viner addressed the laissez-faire attribution to Adam Smith in 1928...
Here is a list of appropriate activities for government, which goes way, way beyond Mark Skousen’s extremely limited – and vague – 'ideal' government. That ... he goes on to attribute his ‘ideal’ list to Adam Smith ... is not alright.In fact, its downright deceitful, for which there is no excuse of ignorance (before attributing the limited ideal to Adam Smith we assume, as scholars must, that Skousen read Wealth Of Nations and noted what Smith actually identified as the appropriate roles of government in the mid-18th century).
Answer:
In 1937, President Roosevelt made a speech suggesting that United States government should be more assertive toward aggressor nations. His suggestion was greeted with massive protest from isolationists who charged Roosevelt with betraying "Americanism"
Henry clay was the negioator
Answer:
Malcolm's attitude changed towards whites.
Explanation:
Malcolm X went on a pilgrimage trip to Mecca in 1964. His experience with the whites changed his perception about them. He became a little less hostile towards them.
Malcolm came in contact with many white Muslims in Mecca. They were friendly and helpful towards him and treated him as an equal. So, he began to understand that, opposing to what Elijah Muhammad taught, racial problems were there, more because of the attitude than of color.
