Answer:
Opportunity cost 900,000
Explanation:
The opportunity cost is the cost of the best alternative rejected, in order to do the pcurrent porohect.
The student, if picked to return on collegue, the opportunity cost will be the rejected baseball team or the rejected football team.
In this case, given two alternatives:
one for 20,000
and one for 900,000
the opportunity cost will be of 900,000 as is the best alternative
The opportunity cost for return to college will use this cost.
Answer:
$844,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Accounts Receivable = $900,000
Credit balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts per books before adjustment = $50,000
Expected amount of uncollectible = $56,000
Bad debt expense at the end of the period is determined by subtracting the credit balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from the expected amount of uncollectible.
Bad debt expense:
= Expected amount of uncollectible - Credit balance
= $56,000 - $50,000
= $6,000
At the end of the period, the allowance for doubtful accounts has a balance of $56,000 that are to be uncollectible.
The cash realizable value of the accounts receivable at December 31, after adjustment, is determined by simply subtracting the Allowance for doubtful accounts from the accounts receivable. It is calculated as follows:
= Accounts Receivable - Allowance for doubtful accounts
= $900,000 - $56,000
= $844,000
Answer: The contingency approach
Explanation:
The contingency approach is one of the type of management theory that helps in understanding the various types of principles in an organization and it is also refers as the situational approach.
The main objective of the contingency approach is that it provide manager the different types of ways to give reaction on the given issue and different types of situation.
According to the question, the contingency approach helps in providing the different types of effective ideas to the manager where they facing different types of problems in an organization.
Therefore, contingency approach is the correct answer.
Answer:
Of course Jo-Anne Roberts can keep the apartment.
Explanation:
Jo-Anne and the previous owner of the apartment had a valid contract by which Jo-Anne was to pay $3.7 million for the apartment. She has already partially completed her performance on the contract, so the seller must perform his part of the contract.
