Both were famous abolitionist in the U.S. although Garrison was white and Douglass was black. They <span>were also close friends and co-workers in the American Anti-Slavery Society up till 1850 when bills for the Compromise were passed.
Garrison to Douglass: with California joining as a free state, we may soon have sufficient support to overturn the Constitution and write a new one. I hope it will be done in a peaceful manner though.
Douglass to Garrison: the founding fathers did not see slavery as a long term phenomenon here; just as Washington DC is ending the slave trade now. We do not need a new Constitution but there may be conflicts when slavery is abolished.
</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Annexation- It extended US territory into the Pacific and helped with the rise of U.S power in the Pacific
Bayonet Constitution- A legal document prepared by anti-monarchists that took the power from much of Hawaiin authority initiating a transfer of power to American, European, and Native Hawaiin elites
Revolt of 1893- The Hawaiin Monarchy was overthrown, which later led to the annexation of Hawaii two years later, making it the 50th state.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Based on the excerpt and the speech in it, we can infer that the American imperialists<u> saw the </u><u>Philippines </u><u>as a </u><u>useful base</u><u> for </u><u>increasing American trade</u><u> with </u><u>East Asia.</u>
The views of the American imperialists were that:
- The Philippines were owned by the United States
- The Philippines were to be used as a base to penetrate China and its markets
The American imperialists believed that the Philippines were theirs and that they had the right to use it as they pleased including as a means to reach the valuable markets of China and the rest of East Asia.
In conclusion, the imperialists viewed the Philippines as a gateway to the East.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/16384818. </em>
That would be True. They did indeed start a uprising
The anti- federalist wanted the addition of the Bill of Rights added on to the Constitution
The federalist did not support the addition of the Bill of Rights because they believed that the Constitution already had enough rights included while the anti federalist wanted more rights actually stated
