1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rom4ik [11]
3 years ago
5

Thomas Jefferson and James Madison had similar economic beliefs. Which of the following was their interpretation of what was mos

t beneficial for the country?
They strongly believed that the government should have a hands off approach to American businesses.
They wanted higher tariffs to support the Northeastern manufacturers.
They supported lowering tariffs and strong foreign trade for American farmers.
They believed the American farmers would benefit with domestic trade within the United States.
History
2 answers:
AleksAgata [21]3 years ago
8 0
A and D. Jefferson was a member of the Democratic-Republican party, which was sort of the opposite of the federalists. He was all about agrarian society, which means farming out the wazoo, and he wanted things to stay small. He figured that farming was the epitome of a good american virtue - self sufficient, hard working - and he was therefore big on telling the government to keep their hands off of things (think of the whiskey rebellion). He thought that if we engaged in foreign trade that our money would flow out of the US and not be replenished enough coming back in. In fact, most of hte founding fathers were big on isolationism (sticking to ourselves and leaving foreign affairs alone), probably because they'd just gone through a huge costly war affair with England and didn't want to deal with that again (think of Geo Washington's farewell speech)
Ede4ka [16]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

They supported lowering tariffs and strong foreign trade for American farmers.

Explanation:

Thomas Jefferson was a defender of the ideal that the government should impact the economy as little as possible. Although that is the case and he did get rid of many taxes, he also believed that he was supposed to protect Americans (as he believes to have done with the Embargo Act). He also did fight for policies that favored farmers.

You might be interested in
What was the cash and carry program and why was it developed
Rainbow [258]

Cash and carry was a policy requested by US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt at a special session of the United States Congress on September 21, 1939, subsequent to the outbreak of war in Europe. It replaced the Neutrality Acts of 1936.

8 0
3 years ago
Who made the decision to drop the atomic bomb on japan.
ICE Princess25 [194]
Harry Truman made the decision
4 0
2 years ago
How might a Northerner react to the actions of John Wilkes Booth? *
likoan [24]
A because he was hated by northerners, did not lead the Confederate army, and did not carry out the March to the Sea.
6 0
3 years ago
The benefits of USA in experience of having minerals and the disadvantages of having minerals​
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The benefits of USA in the experience of having minerals:

-Minerals allow for the economic exploitation of raw materials.

-It is a good source of income for this industry.

-Minerals can be exported and are highly demanded by other nations.

-The exploitation of minerals has created thousands of jobs in the country.

The disadvantages of having minerals:​

-Mining damages the land. Dynamite explosions are needed to dig in the dirt.

-This industry damages the ecology of the place. It is not good for the environment and the wildlife.

-Mining towns that once were very productive end up being ghost towns.

7 0
3 years ago
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which state joined the union in 1810 as a slave state?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the clothing the soldiers wore in the civil war affect them?
    15·1 answer
  • How would you describe Ghana’s military might?
    6·1 answer
  • Ways that the Romans adopted and adapted Greek culture.
    6·1 answer
  • Why does polonius say that he will spy on hamlets conversation with his mother?
    14·2 answers
  • The ottoman and mughal empires had which characteristic in common
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best explains why the passage is
    15·2 answers
  • Can you please help me please
    14·2 answers
  • Please hurry!!! I will mark brainliest!
    13·2 answers
  • ¿Por qué es importante la filosofía contemporánea?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!