1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lyudmila [28]
3 years ago
13

Match the contribution to the appropriate tribe

History
2 answers:
Alona [7]3 years ago
5 0

The Iroquois : formed a confederation that may have inspired the U.S. constitution.

The Powhatan: helped the first settlers from Europe survive.


The Iroquois:gave women a voice in choosing tribal representatives.

I hope it helps!


Rzqust [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

1-The Iroquois : Formed a confederation that may have inspired the U.S. constitution.

2-The Powhatan: Helped the first settlers from Europe survive.

3-The Iroquois: Gave women a voice in choosing tribal representatives.

Explanation:

1-The most accepted hypothesis keeps that the confederation formed by the Iroquois League created before Columbus’ “discovery” of America was the oldest association in North America. Five nations displayed shared linguistic and cultural features, and they allied to shield themselves from intrusion and to consider common problems.

2- Chief Powhatan, Notwithstanding he mistrusts,  supported the British settlers during their first wintertimes. He had earlier observed Spanish colonists, but the guns and powder might give him the advantage he needed to defeat surrounding tribes.

3- The family duties of producing, conserving, and preparing food and clothes and taking charge of the children were just some of the affairs of the Iroquois women who participated in many other ways.

They can gamble, belong to Medicine (spiritual associations), and participate in ceremonies (politica affair).

You might be interested in
What three things would conquered people would have to do in the Roman Empire?
mina [271]

Answer:

Generally they had two very different approaches. By ancient standards — not ours, of course — the Romans were stern but not sadistic conquerors.

Their standard tactic was to enroll defeated enemies as Roman allies or socii. The local elites (or at least, a biddable subset of them) would remain in charge of local affairs. They would be self-governing as far as domestic affairs went. The primary requirement was that the foreign policy of an allied state was firmly subordinated to Rome: no independent alliances or wars were allowed. Socii were required to contribute troops to Roman wars; these troops fought in independent units under their own officers, but high command was exclusively Roman.

The worst thing that usually befell a defeated enemy was the loss of some territory, which could be taken to provide land to Roman settlers who would live there in a new city of their own: a colonia. The colonia was in part a form of plunder, since it took valuable agricultural lands from the defeated enemy. It was also a military foothold intended to keep an eye on strategic locales. However coloniae usually worked as agents of Romanisation as well, particularly in places like Gaul and Spain where the local people would see a Roman colony as a valuable market, a source of exotic goods, and a conduit to the wider world.

Most conquered peoples were gradually assimilated into Roman citizenship. In Italy, this came about through an actual war: long time Roman allies fought to demand full citizenship in the Social War of 91–89BC. More often, local elites would become Roman citizens on a piecemeal basis. People farther down the social scale had fewer opportunities but it was hardly impossible: for example the apostle Paul, a Jew from the province of Cilicia in modern Turkey, was nevertheless a Roman citizen. Eventually the whole of a conquered region might acquire “Latin Rights,” a kind of limited citizenship for every free inhabitant.

The extension of citizenship completed the integration of all the upper classes across the Roman world: non-Romans eventually came to outnumber Italians in the civil service, the army, the Senate and in the ranks of emperors. Finally in 212 AD all free persons in the empire became Roman citizens — though by that time citizenship had little practical political meaning since the empire had no democratic institutions above the level of local government.

In general this system worked pretty well, and by the standards of the time it was fairly generous: the Romans only rarely resorted to the wholesale enslavement and depopulation of defeated enemies, which was otherwise not uncommon.

The flipside of this, however, is that Romans took a very grim view of “allies” who tried to reassert themselves. They regarded a surrender to themselves as a permanently binding contract, and they regarded any breach of that contract with unrestrained fury very different from their normal tactics. The most egregious violence that the Romans inflicted on defeated enemies — the sack of Syracuse (212 BC), the destruction of Carthage and Corinth (both in 146 BC), the levelling of Jerusalem in 70AD — was done to those the Romans regarded as faithless allies, rather than open enemies.

In short, the Romans offered their opponents a mix of incentives: good terms for easy surrender, but terrible punishment for what the Romans saw as “ingratitude” or “stubbornness”

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How did cooperation within early civilizations most likely impact the use of resources?
melisa1 [442]
<span>Co operation within early civilisations likely led to a sharing of resources and therefore an equal abundance of resources for each group. It could also possibly have prevented conflict; if the groups all shared resources, during times of scarcity everyone would have to use less rather than some groups having less and attacking others to get resources.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Which Russian Revolution led to the creation of the Duma?
Nataliya [291]
January 1905 . hope this helps!!!!!!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The direct exchange of one good or service for another is known as
soldi70 [24.7K]
The answer is, C. barter
3 0
2 years ago
How many us presidents have been assassinated or killed while serving as president?
lozanna [386]
Four sitting presidents have been killed, all of them by gunshot: Abraham Lincoln (the 16th President), James A. Garfield (the 20th President), William McKinley (the 25th President) and John F. Kennedy (the 35th President).
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How much did the lenape native people get for the island of Manhattan according to the legend?
    12·1 answer
  • How are rules made? i need help!!
    10·1 answer
  • How did the United States respond to the creation of the European Union (EU) and its challenge?​
    6·1 answer
  • How do specific DNA sequences help cells carry out specialized jobs?
    12·1 answer
  • Anyone who had money could join a professional association to raise their status true or false
    13·2 answers
  • Provide an example of caliphate.
    14·1 answer
  • Which amendment in the Bill of Rights promises this liberty? The powers not delegated to the United States by constitution nor p
    5·1 answer
  • What were the two most significant contributions of early societies in India and Central Asia to mathematics, science, religion,
    5·1 answer
  • The President has the power to negotiate treaties with other nations.<br><br> True or False
    11·2 answers
  • Which country did the dictator jean-bédel bokassa rule?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!