Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
Answer:
wow everything I bet would be really REALLY EXPENSIVE! :P
and if everything would be still made by hand there wouldnt be some things like those we have today! or maybe there would be but there would be really expensive and there would be just a little of them
hey also one thing
Can u Please follow on In.s.ta:
Winii_nails
Explanation:
Answer:
Gibbons v, Ogden strengthened federalism and pertained to Interstate commerce and its regulation.
Explanation:
Answer:
Sophists
Explanation:
Sophists did not believe that gods and goddesses influenced people. They also rejected the concept of absolute right or wrong. They believed that what was right for one person might be wrong for another. Sophists was Socrates
