An effective team would never have Unclear definitions of goals.
Option C is correct answer.
Unclear definitions of goals :
Unclear goals are part of the communication problem that continues to plague many workplaces, and were also cited as the number one cause of stress for tech workers in an earlier Comparably study. Employees who don't know what's expected of them can't perform their best work.
What happens when goals are unclear?
A lack of direction and unclear goals are among the largest reasons why projects fail. While it may be impossible to predict every outcome, taking time early on to define and communicate objectives and goals can radically increase the chance your team successfully completes a project.
Learn more about Unclear definitions of goals :
brainly.com/question/11399548
#SPJ4
Answer: Yes contract has been formed.
Explanation: According to the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (UETA), electronic transactions are just as binding as transactions made on hardcopy documents. Moreover signatures made electronically reinforces the validity of these elctronic documents.
In the scenario the actual signature was signed on a hard copy by the seller, but it was then faxed back to the listing agent. This faxed copy, showing the faxed signature, is an electronic document that confirms the existence of the contract in accordance with the UETA. This faxed signature is as enforceable as an ink signature.
Answer:
C. $3,454 million
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what the Projected cost of goods sold for 2018 will be:
2018 Projected cost of goods sold = [(8,180*1.03)*(3,272/8,180)+1%)]
2018 Projected cost of goods sold = (8,425 * (0.40+1%)
2018 Projected cost of goods sold= 3,454 million
Therefore Projected cost of goods sold for 2018 will be: $3,454 million
<span>Technically, Kyle lied to Patrick about the time at which he would punch him. However, there is no contract to prove that this was what was said on the phone (heresay). Additionally, it does not mention that there was any sort of agreement or consideration made between the two of them regarding this. And even if there was, there might be a legality issue due to the fact that punching is both assault and battery when committed on a person, so the contract may not even be enforceable.
In terms of civil torts, Kyle didn't really commit anything that is pursuable in court, but did commit battery and assault. If Patrick fell or hit his head further and was injured/killed, he would be liable for an involuntary action, of which would be manslaughter if Patrick died. He would also be able to be sued for wrongful death by Patrick's family.</span>
Answer:
Res ipsa loquitur
Explanation:
_____ is a tort in which the presumption of negligence arises because the defendant was in exclusive control of the situation, and the plaintiff would not have suffered injury but for someone's negligence.
Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine in law that one can presume the negligence of a defendant when the facts are glaring.The doctrine has primarily required that a defendant have exclusive power over the occurrence of an injury. negligence could result from
1. an actual causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the resulting harm; 2 a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff; 3 a breach of that duty;
