You should do B It seems right
Answer:
(a) $200,100
(b) $200,100
Explanation:
The movement in the accounts receivable balance at the start and end of an accounting period is due to cash payments, additional credit sales, and any amount written off during the period.
This may be expressed mathematically as
opening balance + sales - cash collected - amount written off = closing balance
$35,100 + $361,800 - cash collected = $196,800
Cash collected = $35,100 + $361,800 - $196,800
= $200,100
Individuals in the group judged to be high in warmth and competence viewed by participants in relation to themselves as an in-group.
An in-group is a group of things, people, or other entities that are similar in some way. In-groups, particularly in humans, are defined by beliefs, values, and identities. Within in-groups, there is a shared understanding that group members share some characteristics. Humans, on the other hand, frequently organize items and their lives into in-groups and out-groups without consciously realizing it. This is a neurological shortcut that brains develop over time to assist humans in sorting and categorizing large amounts of information. Depending on the power dynamics and privilege that result from grouping, the outcomes can be negative, positive, or neutral.
An out-group is a group that is distinguished from an in-group by its dissimilarity. Where an in-group is defined by the presence of a shared element of identity, such as a belief or a trait, and an out-group is defined by the absence of that shared element.
Learn more about in-groups and out-groups here:
brainly.com/question/14429597
#SPJ4
Answer:
my name is no my sign is no my number is no you need to let it go
Explanation:
The answer is "<span>Low price, low price".
</span>
In game theory, the Nash equilibrium which was named after American mathematician John Forbes Nash Jr., is an answering idea of a non-cooperative game including at least two players in which every player is expected to know the equilibrium procedures of alternate players, and no player has anything to pick up by changing just his own strategy. If every player has picked a technique and no player can profit by changing methodologies while alternate players keep theirs unaltered, at that point the present arrangement of methodology decisions and the relating settlements constitutes a Nash equilibrium.
