Answer:
The appendix of a book contains "information supplementing the text" (D).
Explanation:
I hope this helps! :) Have a great day!
Answer:
Martin puts his head down and tries to pull away his hand.
Explanation:
Answer:
<h2>Mr. Firman invited his friend, Mr. Nulty, to come over and have dinner with him and Mrs. Stoner. The maid fixed a big dinner for the three of them, and when they were ready for dessert, she brought a cake out for Mr. Nulty because it was his fifty-ninth birthday. The candles were lit and the lights were turned out so that he could blow out the candles in the dark. Mrs. Stoner then began to clear the table of the food and dishes.</h2>
Explanation:
The given paragraph recounts a past event and thus, the tense of the verbs would be written in the past indefinite tense consequently. Since some of the verbs are mistakenly written in the present tense, they need to be shifted into the past tense(which is called tense shift). This will assist in enhancing the vividness and incision of the narrative account. Thus, verbs like 'fixes, brings, are turned, begins' will be changed into the past in order to make the meaning more precise and clear.
Hello,
I too remember reading this passage along with this type of question. I believe the correct option is the first one. I can eliminate option two and three because after remembering a thesis I read when I did read this passage, the thesis didn't cover subject to empathy or sympathy. She may be sympathetic but the thesis isn't based off that.
By reading the options once again, I can eliminate option four because of the word *dismissive*. I believe the author's viewpoint on this topic was the opposite of dismissive.
In short, I remember the thesis explaining how veterans have great respect that along come with discounts and events dedicated to them. However, the support and respect from society is inadequate to the challenges they face when they arrive home.
This makes me believe she is losing hope.
Thus, I believe the correct answer is option three.
Faith xoxo
Answer:
Recoding the interview without asking for the permission..
Explanation:
Recording an interview is helpful for the researcher to always go back to what exactly interviewee said. This helps in the clarification and also develops accuracy.
But, the most important thing before recording an interview is to always ask the interviewee permission. Ethically (in some places legally) it is always good to ask for the permission to record the interview. Sometimes people may not be comfortable being recorded so it is good to ask for their consent.
In the given scenario, the researcher made the mistake of not asking for the consent of the interviewee to record the interview. As is states that the researcher just sat and hit the record button, it does not mention that the researcher took permission.
So, the correct answer is that the researcher did not take the permission to record the interview.
