Answer:
The advertising technique that involves the giving of an additional item at no extra cost is:
Explanation:
<u>Promotion</u> is an advertising technique based on the customer's perception regarding the price or service provided for a good or service, <u>when an additional item is offered at no extra cost, the customer immediately assumes that the product they are buying has a lower value than others of the same style since you are carrying an additional product with which, if the price were divided between the two products, you would notice a profit</u>.
Answer:
a) 469.40%
b) 18.15%
Explanation:
a)
Total nominal growth rate = 
thus,
Total nominal growth rate = 
= 469.40%
b) Total real growth rate = 
now,
Real earned income in 1976 = 
= 
= $20,267.54
and,
Real earned income in 2016 = 
= 
= $23,947.21
Therefore,
Total real growth rate = 
= 18.15%
Answer:
depletion of the timber tract = $228,000 and
depreciation of the logging roads = $22,800
Explanation:
Timber tract
Depletion rate = (Cost - Residual Value) ÷ Estimated units
= ($2,950,000 - $670,000) ÷ 5,700,000
= $0.40
Depletion expense = Units used x Depletion rate
= 570,000 x $0.40
= $228,000
Logging Roads
Depreciation rate = (Cost - Residual Value) ÷ Estimated units
= ($228,000 - $0) ÷ 5,700,000
= $0.04
Depreciation expense = Units used x Depreciation rate
= 570,000 x $0.04
= $22,800
Answer:
lets look at the options and find the correct one!
obviously technology is not related to this at all. so we can cut it off.
Operations is not applicable as an answer as well. it doesn't seem to fit in.
Structure and executive pay are two different things so nope! not that one!
d. people this option is a bit confusing so lets keep it for now.
e. social responsibility seems like fits in too as the government money saves these companies, the companies have a responsibility to have a fair pay towards their executives.
but as the question asks "example of an organization change attempt focused on influencing", in my view the most suitable one would be PEOPLE since the Politicians, tax payers and news media are all trying to do this by influencing people.
Explanation:
