1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
12345 [234]
3 years ago
15

Write three sentences contrasting the Federalist and Anti-Federalist viewpoints on separation of powers in the Constitution.

History
2 answers:
creativ13 [48]3 years ago
6 0

Federalists believed in a strong central government. They  argued in favor of separation of powers: the division of the government into three separate branches whose powers balance each other. They felt this would be necessary and helpful. On the other hand, Anti-Federalists were fearful that the separation of powers would not equally balance power. They did not believe that this separation could occur in a fair way.

That's the sample answer for e2020.

aleksandr82 [10.1K]3 years ago
4 0
Federalists' beliefs could be better described as nationalist. The Federalists were instrumental in 1787 in shaping the new US Constitution, which strengthened the national government at the expense of the states and people.

Anti<span>-Federalism refers to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The previous constitution, called the Articles of Confederation, gave state governments more authority.
</span>

You might be interested in
Please answer and fast
zaharov [31]

Answer:

B.  Food shortages that led to starvation

Explanation:

There wasn´t a lot of food in the area and the river that was near them was very salty and unsafe to drink along with the mosquitos that lived in the mushy areas cared a certain disease with them.

6 0
2 years ago
Protection of habeas corpus means that?
yarga [219]
Court orders in which a judge requires authorities to prove that a prisoner is being held lawfully and that allows the prisoner to be freed if the judge is not persuaded by the governments case. Habeas corpus rights imply that prisoners have a right to know what charges are being made against them. I am going to say that it is citizens cannot be punished without a trial.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The conference at Potsdam was tense because the:
love history [14]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

There was a fear of communism in the US and Europe.

3 0
2 years ago
The conquistadors was the reason México became a major part of Spanish colonial empire .
malfutka [58]
I think it might be true i’m not sure
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What territory did Britain gain from the French and Indian War?
Ratling [72]
Hi!
The <span> France gave up all its territories in mainland <span>North America
Hope I helped!
</span></span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who helped pay for settling the James River colony
    9·1 answer
  • What is communism?
    6·2 answers
  • Briefly explain the four reasons Social change movements erupted in the United States in the 1960s.
    9·1 answer
  • Joseph Stalin placed a high value on motherhood because he
    9·2 answers
  • Please HELP What was one action that was taken by the First Continental Congress?
    6·2 answers
  • What did the land purchase accomplish
    14·1 answer
  • New netherland governor who refused to surrender to England
    15·1 answer
  • What is malaria and how does it spread
    7·2 answers
  • 3.<br> What were problems related to large-scale immigration?
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think punishment today different from those in Hammurabi time
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!