A possible reason was the attacks on them by crusaders and mongols around the 11th and 12th centuries. Another reason could have been the Arab rulers removing taxes from non Muslims and doing other things that hurt there income.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
B. Yes, increased economic wealth resulted in increased response to environmental issues, and Chinese public opinion compelled the Chinese government to respond with stricter environmental policies.
Explanation:
In China, the great development in the economy of their country came at a great detrimental cost to them- increased environmental issues like fogs, impure air etc. These industries had lead to great challenges to an average Chinese citizens which indirectly reduces their life expectancy.
<em>This had led to protest by the public towards such challenges leading to the government responding with stricter environmental policies. </em><em><u>For example, there will be heavy fine imposed on people who are using a car above 10 - 15 years old due to the excess carbon-dioxide which it passes to the environment.</u></em>
Answer:
Maybe its d
Explanation:
If I'm wrong I'm very sorry
Answer:
Thank you! I feel it, is my last year in high school am a senior about to finish!
Casualty rates at the Battle of Okinawa and Iwo Jima plays a small role in the justification of dropping the atomic bomb, and is by no means the only justification or even the major justification in using the atomic bomb. They were, after all, only used as a statistical report through the casualty per sq. mile report of what can occur when invading the mainland. So yes, it may be a means towards the justification, but as the justification itself it is not.
~