1. King uses his description of segregation as the basis for an argument. What is the central claim of that arguments? What does King ask his audience to do about the situation he describes?
2. What does King mean by "the tranquilizing drug of gradualism"? Why does he warn his audience to resist it?
3. In King's vision, the oppressed do not rise up and crush their oppressors. Why not? How do the details by which he defines his dream fit in with what King tells his audience in paragraphs 6-7 and with his general philosophy of nonviolence?
4. King relies heavily on Figures of Speech throughout his address, particularly metaphor: The nation has given its black citizens a "bad check"; racial injustice is "quicksand"; brotherhood is a "table"; freedom is a bell that rings from the "hilltops". Choose several of these figures that you find effective, and explain how they help King to compare and contrast the "appalling condition" of the past and present with his brighter vision for the future.
Answer:
One of the key features of Renaissance art was the use of geometric and symmetric shapes to create a sense of balance and harmony. Michelangelo's Pietà is shaped like a triangle, with Mary's head at the top and Christ's body in her lap forming the base.
Hopefully this works as an example x
There is no denying the fact that the government has to take care of several pressing issues such as poverty, unemployment and illiteracy. This is particularly true in the case of developing countries. However, this does not mean that the government should not spend money on arts.
Art represents a country and its heritage. Take, for instance, the case of India. The country is famous for its exquisitely sculpted monuments, temples and palaces. They were the handiwork of artists of the bygone era. Even today, the temples and monuments at Konark, Rajasthan and Madurai attract tens of thousands of local and international tourists. They showcase the rich cultural history of the country and elevate its status. If the kings of those times had not patronised art and artists we would not have these monuments to show off now. Not only the monuments but other forms of art like dance and music also need to be preserved for future generations. Otherwise, we will lose touch with our roots.
Government funding is crucial for the existence of arts. Art itself does not generate much revenue and hence artists, especially the lesser-known ones, have to struggle to make a living. This deters many of them from pursuing art as a profession. The only way to kindle their passion is to provide them financial assistance. By doing so, the government can not only protect its artists from starvation but also preserve his cultural legacy. Spending money on arts is also a way of generating money and creating employment. For example, if the government conducts art festivals and exhibitions, they will attract a lot of visitors and return the investment. Such events also provide employment to a number of people. Thus, it is evident that spending on arts is not a waste of resources.
To conclude, it is important for the government to invest in various social and economic welfare schemes. Likewise, it is equally important to invest in arts.
Answer:
depending n what u used if its crayon u can take a q-tip put water on it and rub it in a circle motion on what u want to blend if its a color pencil use the other colors to blend in by putting in lines of the darker and lighter colors if ur using maker take a paint brush dip it in water n go over everything it will bleed the colors n they'll mix
Explanation:
