What criteria are you likely to use when evaluating someone’s argument? Check any that apply. whether the argument shows a lack
of obvious bias whether the author includes facts that support the argument whether the argument’s structure is easy to follow whether the argument uses stories that make an emotional connection whether the argument acknowledges opposing arguments
B). Whether the author includes facts that support the argument.
E). Whether the argument acknowledges opposing arguments.
Explanation:
Evaluation is a meticulous task that requires an in-depth knowledge and understanding of the essay while evaluating it to reach a worthy conclusion. While evaluating an argument, it is important to consider that a valid and effective argument possesses certain traits like credibility, clarity, reasoning, etc. that function to establish its validity and credibility.
As per the question, in order to evaluate an argument that most significant criterion would be 'the inclusion of facts that support the argument' as it helps in concluding that whether the conclusion is based on evidences that helps in examining the reliability of the claim. The examination of the 'acknowledgement of opposing views' helps in determining that whether the author presents an objective point of view to the readers. Thus, <u>options B and E</u> are the correct answers.
Music interludes are used in between interviews of news as to confuse the listeners as to how much time has passed in between new. War of the world was adopted in radio in the attempt to attract listeners from the competitor radio station who is more infamous than it was.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D. "One is that most neighboring jurisdictions are no more than 20 minutes away; it wouldn't be that hard to find someone who didn't know about suspects in a case."
