Another way to measure publics opinions are using surveys.
The correct answers are validity; reliability.
Answer 1: <span>The ability of a test to measure what is purports to measure is called validity.</span> Validity is defined as the ability of a test or study to actually to measure what it claims to measure. For instance, if a test aims to measure a population sample's heart rate, but ends up measuring blood sugar levels instead, it does not have validity, since it did not measure what it claimed or set out to measure. <span>
</span>
Answer 2: Reliability refers<span> to the consistency of test results.</span> Reliability can be defines as the ability of a test or measure to consistently produce the same results at different, times, settings or locations. If the same test or measure produces different outcomes or results at different times or locations, it is low in reliability.
He was right because he was protecting his land and people living on the land. He knew that he was a threat for his land's future. Metis have send many notes and list of rules they need but still the Canadian government was coming and being rude with metis
He was wrong to execute Thomas scott. Luis riel should have thrown Thomas Scott into a jail and ask him why he is so rude and why they dont listen to their suggestions. The Canadian government are the ones who sent Thomas Scott to Red river and claim it to Canadian's. If the Canadian government would listen to Metis, Thomas Scott wouldn't had been excecuted.
Hope this helped. >.< ( > _ < )
