Answer:
15/7 or 2.142
Step-by-step explanation:
x=3/7×5
x=15/7
Solve for <em>x</em> when √(<em>x</em> ² - 4) = 1 :
√(<em>x</em> ² - 4) = 1
<em>x</em> ² - 4 = 1
<em>x</em> ² = 5
<em>x</em> = ±√5
We're looking at <em>x </em>≤ 0, so we take the negative square root, <em>x</em> = -√5.
This means <em>f</em> (-√5) = 1, or in terms of the inverse of <em>f</em>, we have <em>f</em> ⁻¹(1) = -√5.
Now apply the inverse function theorem:
If <em>f(a)</em> = <em>b</em>, then (<em>f</em> ⁻¹)'(<em>b</em>) = 1 / <em>f '(a)</em>.
We have
<em>f(x)</em> = √(<em>x</em> ² - 4) → <em>f '(x)</em> = <em>x</em> / √(<em>x</em> ² - 4)
So if <em>a</em> = -√5 and <em>b</em> = 1, we get
(<em>f</em> ⁻¹)'(1) = 1 / <em>f '</em> (-√5)
(<em>f</em> ⁻¹)'(1) = √((-√5)² - 4) / (-√5) = -1/√5
The sign must be negative; see the attached plot, and take note of the negatively-sloped tangent line to the inverse of <em>f</em> at <em>x</em> = 1.
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
The range are the values that y can take.
From the graph we can see that all defined values of y are below the x- axis
Thus range is y < 0 → b
2. f(x) = x - 2x² - 5 + 10x
=-2x² + 8x - 5
f'(x)= -4x + 8
4. y = 100(45x - 30 - 3x³ + 2x²)
= 100(-3x³ + 2x² + 45x -30)
= -300x³ + 200x² + 4500x - 3000
y' = -900x² + 400x + 4500
(a) Take the Laplace transform of both sides:


where the transform of
comes from
![L[ty'(t)]=-(L[y'(t)])'=-(sY(s)-y(0))'=-Y(s)-sY'(s)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=L%5Bty%27%28t%29%5D%3D-%28L%5By%27%28t%29%5D%29%27%3D-%28sY%28s%29-y%280%29%29%27%3D-Y%28s%29-sY%27%28s%29)
This yields the linear ODE,

Divides both sides by
:

Find the integrating factor:

Multiply both sides of the ODE by
:

The left side condenses into the derivative of a product:

Integrate both sides and solve for
:


(b) Taking the inverse transform of both sides gives
![y(t)=\dfrac{7t^2}2+C\,L^{-1}\left[\dfrac{e^{s^2}}{s^3}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%28t%29%3D%5Cdfrac%7B7t%5E2%7D2%2BC%5C%2CL%5E%7B-1%7D%5Cleft%5B%5Cdfrac%7Be%5E%7Bs%5E2%7D%7D%7Bs%5E3%7D%5Cright%5D)
I don't know whether the remaining inverse transform can be resolved, but using the principle of superposition, we know that
is one solution to the original ODE.

Substitute these into the ODE to see everything checks out:
