Answer:
B)
Step-by-step explanation:
I’m pretty sure but sorry if I’m wrong
<span>Answer: a) Greater than or equal to 38 feet
b)Since there is no restriction on the perimeter there exists many possible values for the length of the deck.
Explanation: Given that the width of the deck is 29 ft.
and the perimeter of the deck is at least 134 ft.
134 = 2(length + width)
134 = (2 x length) + (2 x 29)
134 = (2 x length) + 58
2 x length = 134 - 58
2 x length = 76
length = 76 / 2
length = 38 ft
Thus, the inequality will be:
a)Length ≥ 38 ft
b)since there is no restriction on the perimeter there exists many possible values for length of deck.</span>
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
One. For example, if we chose 5 as the number, then the multiplicative inverse would be 1/5. Multiplying 5 by 1/5 results in one (1).
Step-by-step explanation:
I don't know the answer to this one so could someone please tell me
Thanks
The answer is w⁻²/v⁻².
v/w raised to the second power is (v/w)²
(v/w)² = v²/w²
Since xᵃ = 1/x⁻ᵃ, then v²/w² = 1/v⁻²w²
Since 1/xᵃ = x⁻ᵃ, then 1/v⁻²w² = w⁻²/v⁻²